Alice C. Linsley
From very ancient times humans have recognized number patterns and derived meaning from the patterns. Consider the Pythagorean triangle. According to the Delphic priest Plutarch (46 - 120 A.D.), the Egyptians attributed the sides of the triangle the numbers 3, 4 and 5. The vertical line of 3 is the Osiris line and number. The horizontal line of 4 is the Isis line and number, and the hypotenuse was the Horus line and the number 5. The triangle then represents the male and female principles and the issue of the unity of male and female. That said, the verticality of the hypotenuse indicates that the son is like the father in sharing uprightness or virtue.
The association of the number 4 with the horizontal line also explains why 4 represents the whole earth, over which the Sun makes its daily journey from east to west. There is also the relationship of the 4 cardinal directions which, when connected, form the perpendicular lines of the cross, a fundamental symbol in creation.
Refering again to the triangle, the vertical (masculine) line and the horizontal (feminine) line suggest a third line just as the relationship of man and woman suggest reproduction. In this sense, the 2 gives way to the 3 and the 2:4 relationship gives way to the 5.
In music, the 2:3 interval on a string instrument and keyboard determines the vibration of the perfect fifth. All other harmonic intervals relate to this 2-3 harmonic interval. This suggests something about human communication also, that single phonemes will seek a second and third. We see this among the oldest known languages of the Afro-Asiatic group. The Chadic/Kushitic languages of Abraham's ancestors tended to have 2-syllable words whereas Hebrew and the languages of Mesopotamia tended to have 3-syllable words. There is an interplay between 2 and 3-syllable words in the Hebrew Bible that speak of the mystery of God, an area for further investigation. The 3-syllable words build on the 2-syllable roots, so that Ka-Ba becomes Kaba-lah.
A similar interplay is seen between 2 sons ans 3 sons in the genealogies of Genesis. There are usually 3 first-born sons listed, but the plot of the narrative will involve competition or intermarriage between only 2 of the 3 first-born sons. The third son is often "hidden" or dies. In Genesis this points to the hidden issue of the Woman (Gen. 3:15). Kain, Seth and Abel were brothers, but Abel was killed by Kain. Terah's sons were Haran, Nahor and Abrham. Haran is said to have died in Ur. Abraham had 3 first-borns sons: Joktan, Ishmael and Isaac. Joktan is the least known, yet he was probabaly Abraham's oldest son. The biblical interplay between 2 sons and 3 sons is highly symbolic.
The number 3 compels us to seek the hidden, just as Abraham sought guidance about his unknown future at the Diviner’s Oak near Hebron (Gen.13:18) between Ai and Bethel. Here he later looked up and saw 3 “men” coming to him and ordered 3 measures of flour to make cakes and brought to his visitors 3 gifts: curds, milk and a calf. And Abraham interceded for Sodom 3 times (Gen. 18). It is in the context of this proliferation of 3s that the Lord announces that Sarah will bring forth a son.
In the Hebrew gematria 90 is the value of the Hebrew word for Water - Mem (mem-yod-mem), but the letter W as the symbol for water comes from the ancient Egyptians who would have used W to represent the waters above and M to represent the waters below, the 3 "feet" of the letters determine the location of the waters. As they didn't use zero numberically, the 3 above and the 3 below would be regarded as belonging to the one cosmos represented by the sphere - 0.
Numbers are an interesting and useful device in tracking the tribal and ethnic origins of a document. For example, the Chinese avoid using the number four, which they regard as a bad omen, yet four is a sacred number to the Plains Indians of North America and is used in ceremonies and rites, such as the Vision Quest.
In the Bible we are able to track the origin of some narratives using number symbolism. The Hebrew Bible comes to us from the Afro-Asiatics whose number symbolism can be classified into western and eastern traditions. In the Hamitic-Nilotic tradition the number forty appears often, but forty doesn't appear in the Mesopotamia-Babylonian tradition.
For example, the story of Noah's flood speaks of rain for "forty days and forty nights", reflecting the 40-day flooding of the Nile. In the Book of Daniel, which is rich in number symbolism, the number forty doesn't appear even once. Noah's homeland was near Lake Chad in west central Africa and the Book of Daniel comes from ancient Babylon. So "the forty days and forty nights" in reference to Noah indicates that the context of his story is not Mesopotamia, but Africa. Likewise Israel's forty years of wandering in the wilderness indicates roots in Egypt.
Can you think of other number symbols in the Bible that help us to track the cultural contexts of the narratives?
What about 36? There are 36 righteous men on earth at any given time and are considered the pillars holding up the heavens. They came to be known as 'Lamed Vovniks' and (if I remember correctly) comes from the story of Lot.
ReplyDeleteThe Memnonium in Abydos has 36 column hypostyle hall. The ancient Egyptians divided the year into 36 10-day increments each presided over by a Decan god (planet).
My apologies for not writing more about this VERY interesting subject. Hopefully, I will have time to write about this and also WAW in the near future. Thank you for commenting on my blog. What a treat to read your posts!
I knew you would have something good to contribute! The numbers 36, 9 (3+3+3) and 7 (3+4) certainly deserve more attention.
ReplyDeleteI've posted a link to your blog from Biblical Anthropology and will visit regularly.
My curiousity has been aroused by your comment about the hidden son. The Canaanite practice of sacrificing the first born son without blemish has left remnants in language and Judaic traditions and I wonder if there could be a connection. Pidyon HaBen requires a father to pay the Kohan money 31 days after the first born son without blemish is born to a first-time mother.
ReplyDelete"Consecrate to me all the firstborn. Whatever is the first to open the womb among the people of Israel, both of man and of beast, is mine."
The rationalization is that this money is paid so that the son will not have to serve in the temple. To me this makes no sense. First of all, it is an honor to serve in the temple. Secondly, priestly families are not required to pay this sum. And third, every single temple task is assigned to specific families - commoners excluded. I think Pidyon HaBen could be a remnant of the transition from Canaanite to Israelite culture.
In Genesis the Hidden Son is Christ, who like Abel was killed by his brethren. Who like Haran was cut off before his time. Who like Joktan shared the name and kingdom of his mother Mary's [heavenly] father.
ReplyDeleteThere is a good deal of confusion about the Canaanites. The term is so general that I'm not sure what it means, except to say people who lived in Canaan, and that would include many different peoples.
Just thinking on Canaan.
ReplyDeletePhilistine: Agean sea people (Crete?)
Phoenician: Perhaps Venice/Slovene sea people?
Samaritan/Samaria/Marionite: Highland people linked to Mari
Mari: City in Syria destroyed by Babylonians
Canaanites: lowland people of Canaan
Hyksos of No. Egypt: post-Mari migrants? ~ Catal HoYuK?