Dr. Alice C. Linsley
The Hebrew ruler-priests married two wives. The cousin bride was usually the second wife, and she often named her first-born son after her father. In the diagram we find Lamech the Elder (Gen. 4), father of Naamah, and Lamech the Younger (Gen.5), son of Naamah. The cousin bride’s naming prerogative makes it possible to trace descent through the maternal line in the Bible.
Anthropological study of the biblical Hebrew indicates that
the early Hebrew were a caste. Their social structure is characterized by these
traits of castes: endogamy, membership by birth, hierarchical status, inherited
occupation, appearance such as shaved bodies, distinctive clothing,
circumcision, and restraints on eating with persons outside the caste.
The term “commensality” refers to the positive social
interactions that are associated with people eating together. Communal meals
encourage conversation, increase familiarity, and can lead to closer social,
familial, and marital relations.
Commensality is discouraged in castes for various reasons. The
ancient Egyptian rulers observed restrictions on eating with those regarded as
ritually impure (Gen. 43). The practice of not eating with Gentiles continues
today among strict Orthodox Jews. The prohibition is meant to discourage social
mingling that can lead to marriage outside the caste.
Exceptions were made in diplomatic relations. Hebrew rulers
feasted with non-Hebrew rulers to formalize treaties and covenants. The feasts
usually took place at sacred high places and were accompanied by animal
sacrifice. Scholars have learned much about ancient treaties through the study
of the Mari Tablets (Mesopotamia), the Pact of Esarhaddon (Assyrian), the
Amarna Texts (Egyptian), and the Egyptian-Hittite Peace Treaty.
Some of these pacts are not between equals. Many represent
covenants between high kings and vassals. That is the case with the covenant
made by God in Genesis 15. It is the Lord God himself who passes between the
animal halves while Abraham beholds this miraculous vision. The LORD reminds
Abraham of all his faithfulness to him: "I am the Lord who brought you here
from Ur.” (Gen. 15:7) “I am your Shield; your reward shall be very great."
(Gen. 15:1)
The Antiquity of the Hebrew caste
The Hebrew are probably the oldest known caste. They served at shrines, temples, and mortuary sites at least 1000 years before the caste system of India emerged. The Nilotic Hebrew had a moiety system. The Horite and Sethite Hebrew maintained separate shrines and temples. They were one caste organized into two ritual groups.
During the pre-dynastic period and the Old Kingdom (ca. 2575-2130 BC) the Hebrew priests were organized in groups called "phyles." Each phyle served a two-week duration before returning home. The later organization of priests in Israel appears to have developed from the phyle system.
There were twenty-four divisions or “courses” of priests in
Israel. These are listed in 1 Chronicles 24:7-18. Each course served in
rotation twice a year for a duration of one week. The priests lived in
Jerusalem and throughout the land of Israel. When it came time for the division
to go up to Jerusalem, the priests left their homes and returned after their
term of service. When not functioning as a priest, these individuals went about
their normal routines, tending to their various occupations: stone masons,
miners, tomb builders, carpenters, potters, tent makers, shepherds, goatherds,
farmers, merchants, and smiths.
Two priestly divisions are of special interest: the eight
division of Abijah, and the eighteenth division of Happizzez (1 Chron. 24:15).
According to Luke 1:39, Abijah lived near Jerusalem in the "hill country”
in a city of Judah. Zacharias, the father of John the Forerunner, belonged to
the division of Abijah (Luke 1:5-7). Rabbinic literature claims that at age
thirty, “John the Immerser” was commissioned as a priest to serve in the same
division as his father.
The division of Happizzez was based in Nazareth. This was
the division to which Joseph belonged. Joseph, the husband of Mary, was named
for his ancestor Joseph, the son of Mattathias (Luke 3:24-25). Mary, the mother
of Jesus, was Joseph’s cousin bride. She was of a priestly division also. Her
father Joachim was a priest of Nazareth. He married Anna, the daughter of
Matthan, a priest of Bethlehem. Matthan had three daughters: Mary, Zoia, and
Anna. Mary and Zoia resided in Bethlehem. Zoia was the mother of Elizabeth, and
the grandmother of John the Forerunner. Anna miraculously conceived in her old
age and gave birth to Mary, the mother of Jesus.
Matthan is related to the names Mattatha, Matthat,
Mattathias, Mattaniah, Mattai, and Matthew. The name, with its variant
spellings, appears five times in Luke’s list of Jesus’ ancestors (Luke
3:23-38). The name derives from the word for “gift.” Mattaniah means “gift of
God” and is a name found among priests in I Chronicles 25:3-4. The name also
may refer to the giving of wisdom which is “Maat” in ancient Egyptian. A priest
named Maath is listed in Luke 3:26.
All these ancestors of Jesus were high-ranking individuals
in their communities and heirs to the customs of their ruler-priest forebearers.
The earliest of those ancestors are named in the king lists of Genesis 4 and 5.
Their historicity has been demonstrated through kinship analysis.
Related reading: Abraham the Hebrew; Hebrew, Israelite, or Jew?; Hebrew Rulers With Two Wives; Horite and Sethite Mounds; Hebrew at Ancient Sun Cities
"These priests were dispersed in the service of the early kingdom builders such as Nimrod the Kushite."
ReplyDeleteThis is a startling claim. I wish blogspot was better with footnotes because I would love to see it.
The data is found in the biblical texts. Nimrod was a son or Kush. Kush is associated with the Nile Valley, yet Nimrod established his territory in Mesopotamia. The wide dispersal of these early Hebrew ruler-priests is due to a feature of their marriage and ascendancy pattern in which sons who were not heirs were sent away. Learn as much as you can about their kinship pattern. https://jandyongenesis.blogspot.com/2011/06/sent-away-sons.html
ReplyDelete