Monday, October 4, 2010

DNA Research Confirms Kushite Migration

The book of Genesis indicates that Kushites moved out of the Upper Nile area into Eurasia where they established territories. Kushite rulers, such as Nimrod, and their priests spread a common worldview from ancient Kush/Nubia to southern India and beyond.  This vast Kushite/Sudanese (Sudra) sphere of influence is called the Afro-Asiatic Dominion.

Here is the DNA research which verifies the biblical record:

Archaeogenetics is the use of genetics, archaeology and linguistics to explain and discuss the origin and spread of homo sapien sapiens (Renfrew, 2010). In this paper we will use archaeogenetics to examine and discuss the spread of haplogroup R-M173 by the ancient Kushites.

Researchers have outlined two possible out of Africa events in the past 40 ky. Although these out of Africa events occurred during prehistory the Classical writers of Greece and Rome discussed a recent migration of people from Africa into Eurasia. This African population was called: Kushites

A review of the archaeological, linguistic, genomic and craniometric literature was used to explore the role of the Kushites in the spread of haplogroup R from Africa to Eurasia. In this analysis of the linguistic, craniometric, and related scientific literatures we will determine if archaeological and genomic evidence can trace a migration event and dispersal of Kushites into Eurasia as maintained by the Classical writers. This study was conducted in Chicago at the Uthman dan Fodio Institute

Read more here.

9 comments:

  1. Did the city of Mohenjo Daro belong to the Kushite Sudras?
    Are Dravidians the indigenous peoples of the Indian subcontinent? Or just one group of peoples among heterogenous indigenous peoples?
    Are Dravidians Kushite/Sudras?
    I once read a book about Catal Hayuk and it stated that the inhabitants of the city seemed to "Afro-Eurasian" according to their skull measurements. Please weigh in.
    Finally, have you ever been accused of afrocentrism?

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Sudra of the Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro civilization are Sudanese. Even today the Sudra of southern India follow the Laws of Manu, who was said to be the founder of the first Sudanese dynasty.

    The Hebrew "rison adam" = ancestral man is "adamu orisa" = ancestral Adam in Hahm/Hausa. The Hausa word for human being is "dan adam." The Sanskrit word for male human is "manu" which resembles the Hamitic "adamu" more closely than the Hebrew word.

    The Hebrew "abba" = father, corresponds to the Hausa/Hahm "baba" = father. The Dravidian word for father is “appa”.

    The Sanscrit “svah” = sky or heaven, corresponds to the Semitic “svam” or “Sam-yim” = sky or heavens. The Proto-Dravidian word for heaven is "van". The Spanish word for attic or rooftop room is "desvan", which comes from the Arabic word svan. The Ja-van tribe (Gen. 10:2) is likely named for the God of Heaven.

    The Hebrew root "thr" = to be pure, corresponds to the Hausa/Hahm "toro" = clean, and to the Tamil "tiru" = holy. All are related to the proto-Dravidian "tor" = blood.

    There are many close connections between Dravidian and ancient Kushitic roots for words. This is further evidence that the Sudroid, which includes the Dravidians, originated in the Upper Nile region that we know today as Sudan. From there they migrated in a northeastern direction.

    The Indian archaeological B. B. Lal contends that the Dravidians came from southern Egypt and Sudan/Nubia. This explains their dark complexion. Lal writes: "At Timos [Sudan} the Indian team dug up several megalithic sites of ancient Nubians which bear an uncanny resemblance to the cemeteries of early Dravidians which are found all over Western India from Kathiawar to Cape Comorin. The intriguing similarity extends from the subterranean structure found near them. Even the earthenware ring-stands used by the Dravidians and Nubians to hold pots were identical." The Nubian megaliths of which Lal speaks date from around 1000 B.C.

    I've been accused of many things, but never of afrocentrism! : )

    ReplyDelete
  3. http://www.torontolife.com/features/were-here-were-tamil-get-used-it/?pageno=1
    this is dravidian guy's canaanites are indeed from the sub saharan nubia was called cush as well

    ReplyDelete
  4. http://www.torontolife.com/features/were-here-were-tamil-get-used-it/?pageno=1
    tamil

    ReplyDelete
  5. http://billygambelaafroasiaticanthropology.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/bedscha2.jpg
    afro asiatic person is like this [aste and copy u will see sumerian is not afro asiatic the afro asiatic culture is from elam the elamites and the dravidians and elamites were similar in features guys i understand why people are confusing the sumerians as kushites they are not they from canaan sub saharan is not horn of africa
    this is where the mistake is

    ReplyDelete
  6. and by the way the dravidians are indeed L ydna which is found in mari the north eastern city in syria and it was sumerian 33% of the eastern syrians have L which is dna of the dravidians

    ReplyDelete
  7. the dravidians are from sumerians who have L y dna
    too many lies yes nubia was called cush but the dravidians are from canaan afro asiatic is from phut berber is afro asiatic and berbers are not from cush!

    ReplyDelete
  8. The Persian historian Muhammad ibn Jarir al-Tabari (c. 915) recounts a tradition that the wife of Canaan was named Arsal, a daughter of Batawil son of Tiras, and that she bore him the "Blacks, Nubians, Fezzan, Zanj, Zaghawah, and all the peoples of the Sudan it is the abbysinians and blacks that come from cush dravidians are from canaan i dreamt 2 times the dravidians are from canaan and the blacks and abbysinians are from cush i think people are making a mistake nubia was also given the name cush so i think this is why it has been assumed they the sumerians/dravidians are from cush

    ReplyDelete
  9. sorry i dreamt 2 times dravidians are from sumerians and 1 time they are from canaan

    ReplyDelete